Skip to main content

how can we use ICT and Modernization to development people ?

 

 Name: mohamed khadar jama

EMAIL: INANKA112@GMAIL.COM

Red/no: 2020-01-00766

Course title: Ict for development

Year: one

Semester: one

Course CODE: ITE 7103

Lectured: MUWANGA ZAKE

DEPARMENT: INFORMATION SYSTEM

 

Assignment

how  can we use ICT and Modernization to development people?

Modernization Theory: How countries should develop

Rostov believed that an initial injection of aid from the west in the form of training, education, economic investment etc. would be enough to jolt a society into economic growth overcoming these cultural barriers.

Rostov suggested that development should be seen as an evolutionary process in which countries progress up 5 stages of a development ladder

Rostov’s five stage model of development

Stage 1 – Traditional societies whose economies are dominated by subsistence farming. Such societies have little wealth to invest and have limited access to modern industry and technology. Rostov argued that at this stage there are cultural barriers to development (see sheet 6)

Stage 2 – The preconditions for take off – the stage in which western aid packages brings western values, practices and expertise into the society. This can take the form of:

ü  Science and technology – to improve agriculture

ü  Infrastructure – improving roads and cities communications

ü  Industry – western companies establishing factories

These provide the conditions for investment, attracting more companies into the country.

Stage 3 – Take off stage –The society experiences economic growth as new modern practices become the norm. Profits are reinvested in infrastructure etc. and a new entrepreneurial class emerges and urbanized that is willing to invest further and take risks. The country now moves beyond subsistence economy and starts exporting goods to other countries

This generates more wealth which then trickles down to the population as a whole who are then able to become consumers of new products produced by new industries there and from abroad.

Stage 4- the drive to maturity.

More economic growth and investment in education, media and birth control. The population start to realize new opportunities opening up and strive to make the most of their lives.

Stage 5 The age of high mass consumption. This is where economic growth and production are at Western levels.

Variations on Rostov’s 5 stage model

Different theorists stress the importance of different types of assistance or interventions that could jolt countries out their traditional ways and bring about change.

ü  Hoselitz – education is most important as it should speed up the introduction of Western values such as universalism, individualism, competition and achievement measured by examinations. This was seen as a way of breaking the link between family and children.

ü  Inkless – media – Important to diffuse ideas nontraditional such as family planning and democracy

ü  Hoselitz – urbanization. The theory here is that if populations are packed more closely together new ideas are more likely to spread than amongst diffuse rural populations

 

Criticisms of Modernization Theory

1.     The Asian Tiger economies combined elements of traditional culture with Western Capitalism to experience some of the most rapid economic growth of the past 2 decades.

2.     Ignores the ‘crisis of modernism’ in both the developed and developing worlds. Many developed countries have huge inequalities and the greater the level of inequality the greater the degree of other problems: High crime rates, suicide rates, health problems, drug abuse.

3.     Ethnocentric interpretations tend to exclude contributions from thinkers in the developing world. This is a one size fits all model, and is not culture specific.

4.     The model assumes that countries need the help of outside forces. The central role is on experts and money coming in from the outside, parachuted in, and this downgrades the role of local knowledge and initiatives. This approach can be seen as demeaning and dehumanizing for local populations. Galeano (1992) argues that minds become colonized with the idea that they are dependent on outside forces. They train you to be paralyzed and then sell you crutches. There are alternative models of development: See sheet no…

5.     Corruption (Kleptocracy) prevents aid of any kind doing well, much aid is siphoned off by corrupt elites and government officials rather than getting to the projects it was earmarked for. This means that aid creates more inequality and enables elites to maintain power

6.     There are ecological limits to growth. Many modernization projects such mining and forestry have lead to the destruction of environment.

7.     Social damage – Some development projects such as dams have led to local populations being removed forcibly from their home lands with little or no compensation being paid.

8.     Some Marxist theorists argue that aid and development is not really about helping the developing world at all. It is really about changing societies just enough so they are easier to exploit, making western companies and countries richer, opening them up to exploit cheap natural resources and cheap labor. Joseph Stiglitz notes that those countries that followed alternative models of development ignoring western advice are now competing with the west, China and India are two examples.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions

Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Understanding Different Countries https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_66.htm Imagine this scenario: Sayid's boss has asked him to manage a large, global team. In this new role, he'll be working closely with people in several different countries. He's excited about the opportunities that his connectedness will present, but he's also nervous about making cross-cultural faux pas. He knows that cultural differences can act as a barrier to communication, and that they could affect his ability to build connections and motivate people. So, how can he begin to understand these differences and work effectively with people from different cultures? © iStockphoto takasuu Learn how to work with teams and co-workers from around the world. In this article, we'll explore how you can use Hofstede's Six Dimensions of Culture to work effectively with people from a range of cultural and geographic backgrounds. ...

Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory

Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory is a framework for cross-cultural communication , developed by Geert Hofstede . It describes the effects of a society's culture on the values of its members, and how these values relate to behavior, using a structure derived from factor analysis . [1] Hofstede developed his original model as a result of using factor analysis to examine the results of a world-wide survey of employee values by IBM between 1967 and 1973. It has been refined since. The original theory proposed four dimensions along which cultural values could be analyzed: individualism-collectivism; uncertainty avoidance; power distance (strength of social hierarchy) and masculinity-femininity (task orientation versus person-orientation). Independent research in Hong Kong led Hofstede to add a fifth dimension, long-term orientation, to cover aspects of values not discussed in the original...

Reviving Critical Modernism in Development Studies

Reviving Critical Modernism in Development Studies 7 September 2016 Richard Heeks https://ict4dblog.wordpress.com/2016/09/07/reviving-critical-modernism-in-development-studies/ Critical modernism forms a very small, rather dated trickle of ideas within development studies. How could it be updated to serve as a lens for current research? Critical modernism can be understood as a wide sweep of ideas, particularly encompassing thinkers such as Habermas and Gramsci [1] .  But it has only a small explicit footprint within development studies largely triggered by a chapter in Peet & Hartwick’s book Theories of Development , published in 1999 [2] .  Itself developed from earlier work, this was particularly a response to “post-development” ideas that arose in the 1980s. Despite subsequent editions of Theories of Development , the core text on critical modernism by Peet & Hartwick remains unchanged, and the specific notion has gained little overt traction in...